logo
Developers

PlanB Quant Investing 101 v2

Script from: TradingViewSwing

Audit verdict

Not rankedUpdated Jul 28, 2026

No reliable edge found

Its average result can't be told apart from chance, so it stays out of our rankings. The script itself passed our repainting audit.

443backtests3 markets
28robust scoreranked median 52
0.67p-valueranked median 0.24
0/1pass quality gatebacktests >15 trades

Audit details

How we decide whether a strategy enters our rankings. Read the methodology →

✓
Repainting audit
8 of 8 checks passed.
✓
Script availability
Open-source, still published on TradingView.
✕
Statistical edge
Average t-statistic 0.44 (p = 0.67), below the median of 1.98 (p = 0.24) for ranked strategies.
✕
Quality gate
None of the 1 backtests with more than 15 trades passes our quality gate.
✕
Robust score
28/100, below the median of 52 for ranked strategies.

How its evidence compares

The t-statistic measures how far the average result sits from zero relative to its noise. Below about 2, it is within what random entries produce.

0.44
avg. t-statistic
1.98
median, ranked strategies

The only stored backtest

Shown for transparency.

SymbolTimeframeNet profitProfit factorTradesMax drawdown
MNTUSDT SPOT
BYBIT:MNTUSDT
5m+52%3.281622%
⚠Selected after the fact: these are the best 1 of 443 runs, not what to expect from this strategy. All have fewer than 60 trades, too few to separate skill from luck.

Is PlanB Quant Investing 101 v2 profitable?

Not reliably, based on our tests. Across 443 backtests, 0 of 1 with more than 15 trades pass our quality gate. The best result is +52% on MNTUSDT SPOT (5m, 16 trades). On average, its results are statistically indistinguishable from chance (p = 0.67).

Strategies that passed our audit

Ranked strategies from the same family, ordered by robust score.

Explore the best Trading & TradingView strategies

Stop trading blindly. Explore quality-gated backtests and improve your trading skills with data.

Start for free