Filtered Bollinger Bands By @Tradingade
Audit verdict
No reliable edge found
Its average result can't be told apart from chance, so it stays out of our rankings.
Audit details
How we decide whether a strategy enters our rankings. Read the methodology →
How its evidence compares
The t-statistic measures how far the average result sits from zero relative to its noise. Below about 2, it is within what random entries produce.
Best 5 of 2,119 backtests
Shown for transparency.
| Symbol | Timeframe | Net profit | Profit factor | Trades | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Motors Company NYSE:GM | 2H | +6,242% | 1.31 | 207 | 64% |
Urban Outfitters, Inc. NASDAQ:URBN | 2H | +1,788% | 1.63 | 283 | 71% |
Femasys Inc. NASDAQ:FEMY | 4H | +988% | 12.05 | 16 | 69% |
Wells Fargo & Company NYSE:WFC | 2H | +857% | 1.38 | 290 | 60% |
HENRY HUB NATURAL GAS FUTURES NYMEX:NG1! | 1H | +714% | 1.74 | 394 | 31% |
Is Filtered Bollinger Bands By @Tradingade profitable?
Not reliably, based on our tests. Across 2,119 backtests, 4 of 146 with more than 15 trades pass our quality gate. The best result is +6,242% on General Motors Company (2H, 207 trades). On average, its results are statistically indistinguishable from chance (p = 0.34).
Strategies that passed our audit
Ranked strategies from the same family, ordered by robust score.
Explore the best Trading & TradingView strategies
Stop trading blindly. Explore quality-gated backtests and improve your trading skills with data.
Start for free