Adaptive, Zero lag Schaff Trend Cycle Backtest (Simple) [Loxx]
Audit verdict
No reliable edge found
Its average result can't be told apart from chance, so it stays out of our rankings.
Audit details
How we decide whether a strategy enters our rankings. Read the methodology →
How its evidence compares
The t-statistic measures how far the average result sits from zero relative to its noise. Below about 2, it is within what random entries produce.
Best 5 of 1,656 backtests
Shown for transparency.
| Symbol | Timeframe | Net profit | Profit factor | Trades | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citigroup, Inc. NYSE:C | 2H | +1,919% | 1.19 | 1,458 | 42% |
HENRY HUB NATURAL GAS FUTURES NYMEX:NG1! | 4H | +826% | 1.17 | 1,121 | 44% |
Ford Motor Company NYSE:F | 1H | +418% | 1.18 | 1,442 | 18% |
Plug Power, Inc. NASDAQ:PLUG | 2H | +395% | 1.13 | 1,430 | 91% |
HENRY HUB NATURAL GAS FUTURES NYMEX:NG1! | 2H | +377% | 1.14 | 1,441 | 48% |
Is Adaptive, Zero lag Schaff Trend Cycle Backtest (Simple) [Loxx] profitable?
Not reliably, based on our tests. Across 1,656 backtests, 5 of 92 with more than 15 trades pass our quality gate. The best result is +1,919% on Citigroup, Inc. (2H, 1458 trades). On average, its results are statistically indistinguishable from chance (p = 0.14).
Strategies that passed our audit
Ranked strategies from the same family, ordered by robust score.
Explore the best Trading & TradingView strategies
Stop trading blindly. Explore quality-gated backtests and improve your trading skills with data.
Start for free